<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing &#8220;BigBrother&#8221;, yet another Semantic Web bot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2005/09/introducing-bigbrother-yet-another-semantic-web-bot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2005/09/introducing-bigbrother-yet-another-semantic-web-bot/</link>
	<description>W3C has the DOM, and the Dom ; pick the one you prefer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nchauvat</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2005/09/introducing-bigbrother-yet-another-semantic-web-bot/comment-page-1/#comment-64411</link>
		<dc:creator>nchauvat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/?p=86#comment-64411</guid>
		<description>I refactored the code of redlandbot. It was fun. If you want a more general-purpose intelligent agent, try http://www.logilab.org/project/narval</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I refactored the code of redlandbot. It was fun. If you want a more general-purpose intelligent agent, try <a href="http://www.logilab.org/project/narval" rel="nofollow">http://www.logilab.org/project/narval</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jghk lswcgujk</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2005/09/introducing-bigbrother-yet-another-semantic-web-bot/comment-page-1/#comment-63732</link>
		<dc:creator>jghk lswcgujk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 06:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/?p=86#comment-63732</guid>
		<description>kjlwhi dysba pkmutawrv nsjphkri ewcla wmskur gczjfroq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kjlwhi dysba pkmutawrv nsjphkri ewcla wmskur gczjfroq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2005/09/introducing-bigbrother-yet-another-semantic-web-bot/comment-page-1/#comment-20921</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/?p=86#comment-20921</guid>
		<description>We have a bot project called Intel/Agent. You can find it at: 

http://www.intelagent.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a bot project called Intel/Agent. You can find it at: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.intelagent.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.intelagent.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Beale</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2005/09/introducing-bigbrother-yet-another-semantic-web-bot/comment-page-1/#comment-4077</link>
		<dc:creator>John Beale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/?p=86#comment-4077</guid>
		<description>I had my doubts when I first saw the SQL style in RDQL (or whichever), wondering why that approach was taken rather than an RPath. The latter did seem the intuitive approach. Since then I&#039;ve only read the articles on the Path side, but have played around with the SQL side. Ok, I&#039;ve run into some situations where something like a recursive call would have been welcome. But generally SPARQL appears to work a treat, and I reckon conceptually very easy for anyone with a vague idea of SQL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had my doubts when I first saw the SQL style in RDQL (or whichever), wondering why that approach was taken rather than an RPath. The latter did seem the intuitive approach. Since then I&#8217;ve only read the articles on the Path side, but have played around with the SQL side. Ok, I&#8217;ve run into some situations where something like a recursive call would have been welcome. But generally SPARQL appears to work a treat, and I reckon conceptually very easy for anyone with a vague idea of SQL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie_B</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2005/09/introducing-bigbrother-yet-another-semantic-web-bot/comment-page-1/#comment-4075</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie_B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/?p=86#comment-4075</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;ll see a lot of interesting results when people start stress-testing SPARQL (i.e. writing queries that are more than just SELECT ?x WHERE (?x foaf:knows rich:Rich)). It&#039;s debatable whether SPARQL is &quot;good enough&quot; (striking the right balance of simplicity and familiarity versus power), or whether missing features or a basis in SQL is detrimental, and I think that exposure to real applications will illuminate this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;ll see a lot of interesting results when people start stress-testing SPARQL (i.e. writing queries that are more than just SELECT ?x WHERE (?x foaf:knows rich:Rich)). It&#8217;s debatable whether SPARQL is &#8220;good enough&#8221; (striking the right balance of simplicity and familiarity versus power), or whether missing features or a basis in SQL is detrimental, and I think that exposure to real applications will illuminate this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B:datenbrei &#187; Blog Archive &#187; short update</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2005/09/introducing-bigbrother-yet-another-semantic-web-bot/comment-page-1/#comment-3911</link>
		<dc:creator>B:datenbrei &#187; Blog Archive &#187; short update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/?p=86#comment-3911</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, I&#8217;ve be in beet a few days, thus haven&#8217;t been hacking. Now I try to catch up with all the interessting stuff arround. My main interesst by now is Sparql/XMPP and Jena therefor. I&#8217;m going to implement a bot very simular to BigBrother but split up in an bot that talks with the user and one that serves Sparql Queries via XMPP - which seems to me like a natural extension of the RDF Net API. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, I&#8217;ve be in beet a few days, thus haven&#8217;t been hacking. Now I try to catch up with all the interessting stuff arround. My main interesst by now is Sparql/XMPP and Jena therefor. I&#8217;m going to implement a bot very simular to BigBrother but split up in an bot that talks with the user and one that serves Sparql Queries via XMPP &#8211; which seems to me like a natural extension of the RDF Net API. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
