<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fake SpamAssassin headers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/fake-spamassassin-headers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/fake-spamassassin-headers/</link>
	<description>W3C has the DOM, and the Dom ; pick the one you prefer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:27:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rebuilding The Spam Barrier</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/fake-spamassassin-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-64041</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebuilding The Spam Barrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/fake-spamassassin-headers/#comment-64041</guid>
		<description>[...] mail ISP uses SpamAssassin and the headers are a great guide. (However, I have read reports of bogus SA headers possibly added by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mail ISP uses SpamAssassin and the headers are a great guide. (However, I have read reports of bogus SA headers possibly added by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
