<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &lt;cite&gt; obsessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/cite-obsessions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/cite-obsessions/</link>
	<description>W3C has the DOM, and the Dom ; pick the one you prefer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WRT: Writer Response Theory &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Citation Footers for Academic Blogging</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/cite-obsessions/comment-page-1/#comment-5272</link>
		<dc:creator>WRT: Writer Response Theory &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Citation Footers for Academic Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/cite-obsessions/#comment-5272</guid>
		<description>[...] Are these new concerns? The tag CITE was part of the orginal HTML specification. We could also consider extending the CITE tag for contemporary use, and reflect on the observation that HTML was originally developed to support a citational culture - the circulation of scientific papers. This was pointed out by&#8230; someone. The name wasn&#8217;t on the posting page. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are these new concerns? The tag CITE was part of the orginal HTML specification. We could also consider extending the CITE tag for contemporary use, and reflect on the observation that HTML was originally developed to support a citational culture &#8211; the circulation of scientific papers. This was pointed out by&#8230; someone. The name wasn&#8217;t on the posting page. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/cite-obsessions/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominique Hazaël-Massieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/cite-obsessions/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Oooh, nice labsus, indeed :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, nice labsus, indeed :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/cite-obsessions/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2004/07/cite-obsessions/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&quot;Technocrati&quot; -- was that on purpose? It give a whole other flavour to the word :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Technocrati&#8221; &#8212; was that on purpose? It give a whole other flavour to the word :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
